Mums on Magazine Covers

It seems putting a Mum on a magazine cover draws attention.

There’s been a hullabaloo over the latest Time cover. It’s a provocative shot highlighting a story on attachment parenting including the headline “Are You Mom Enough?”.

As I am sure the Editors had expected, woman everywhere took the bait and launched full throttle into the usual mummy wars battle. There was criticism of blogger, Joanne Beauregard for allowing herself to be photographed in that way, there were attacks on the attachment parent philosophy, while proponents of the practice leapt to its defence.

But let’s leave aside the debate over breastfeeding and the attachment parenting movement for a moment. There’s no doubt the print industry is facing new challenges from the online world, does that mean magazines now have to create more controversial covers than ever before? Is going viral a target for a print publication? If so, does increased visibility online transfer into more real world sales?

Blogger, Alana House of House Goes Home is a former magazine editor who spent 20 years working in the industry. When I asked her if covers needed to court controversy to gain online attention she said “I think magazine editors sometimes confuse publicity with sales. While the recent Time cover went viral, I can’t see many businessmen buying copies. What bloke in a suit wants to be spotted reading that on their morning commute? So it depends what the aim is. If you want to get people talking, yes, you need to be provocative. But if you want to sell magazines – on a sustained basis – make your product more relevant to your core reader.”

Nowadays we have so many avenues for information – blogs, online magazines, websites, Facebook, Twitter, almost all of which are free and available to us 24/7. The mags sitting forelornly on the newsagent shelves are sometimes an afterthought in our busy lives. What does it take to make you buy a magazine?

Alana says “I read so many magazines that feel flat and empty. You can’t afford to be flat and empty. Every page needs to work hard and hook people, so they’re willing to put down their hard-earned cash again next time. There are so many demands on readers’ time these days, the internet is such a time-sucker – just keeping up with Facebook and Twitter is exhausting – that magazines need to be constantly on their game to survive”.

Looking at the portrayal of motherhood on current covers it seems to head either to controversial or perfection.  This month’s Harper’s Bazaar gives us actress Nicole Kidman with daughter Faith Margaret. It’s a beautiful shot – oh to have a fashion team, a make-up artist and a great photographer! Would you be more inclined to buy because of the beauty of the picture?

In effect neither of the “mum” covers represents reality for the majority of mothers – but do we want reality?

Can a cover sway your decision to purchase? Or do you have your favourite magazines you buy every edition regardless of what’s on the front cover? Are you buying more or less magazines lately?


7 thoughts on “Mums on Magazine Covers

  1. I don’t know if the cover sways my decision to purchase, but it does influence whether I pick up a magazine and have a look. I feel like we’re overrun with paper and I don’t bring magazines home unless I really love what’s inside.

  2. Like one of my shallow reasons for picking up a book, the mag cover does sway me. I’d choose Nicole, not because I like her so much as it just appeals to me more, if I were to choose between those two mags, which I wouldn’t. The boobs ( excuse the expression) could be in that little boys face all he wants. I don’t want them in mine when I’m standing in line waiting to spend my hard earned cash. Just sayin’

  3. I feel sorry for the 4 year old child that is yet to be weaned. I suspect he is going to be in for some emotional problems when he gets older, if he’s not suffering a few already. Give it a couple of years, when some of his future classmates recognize him, the kid is going to get crucified in school. I hope the money was worth it when all is said and done to flaunt such odd and ridiculous child rearing. As for Nicole, she does look good with her child, but like you said, Janine … we’d all look like a million dollars if we were catered to, and had makeup artists on call. I suspect a nanny here or there helps too. I wonder how Nicole would fare in the real world of motherhood without any help?

  4. hi janine, interesting topic. i suppose the covers would influence me, but really i like to read about sports. so i buy certain magazines that talk about sports. also i am careful about what i bring in the house, because my children also love to read. i won’t have something here i wouldn’t find appropriate for them, too. happy weekend!

  5. I’m buying less magazines, I have yet to find one that totally entices me. Actually, I read the first edition of “Average” magazine a few weeks ago and I really enjoyed that – it was quirky and interesting and I had no idea what was coming next. I think that there are a lot of online magazines that I would really enjoy, but I’d rather have them in print so that I can read them while I’m travelling and write in them and bend the corners of pages. Maybe one day in life I’ll find time and energy to read online magazines, but that’s not today unfortunately…

  6. Pingback: Our Favourite Mags.. « Hocus Pocus

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s